Charles Beard: Martin Luther and the Reformation: Ch.10-Diet of Worms, 4...
1.
“But
they [Papists, including the legates Aleander and Caracciola] bear abundant
witness to the contemptuous hatred, not unmingled with fear, with which Luther
was regarded by the leading Papalists; he has no better names for him than `ribald,’
‘thief,’ ‘assassin,’ ‘monster,’ ‘Alius,’ ‘Mahomet,’ and the like” (415). Yet, in
Germany, things are afoul: “`At present,’ he writes on the 8th of February, `all
Germany is in commotion: nine out of every ten cry `Luther,’ and the tenth, if
he do not care for what Luther says, at least cries, `Death to the Court of Rome!’
and every one demands and shrieks `Council! Council!’ and will have it in
Germany” (416). Aleander was instructed to demand the burning of Luther’s books
and that Luther should be remanded to Rome. Meanwhile, things were being watched
from Wittenberg. Italian politics was “ever-eddying” (417). Luther had burned the
Pope’s bull on 10 Dec 1520. Should Luther go? His response to Spalatin on 21 Dec
1521: “…If, therefore, it must needs be that I should be delivered into the
hands of both the prelates and the peoples, the will of the Lord be done. Lo,
here you have my mind and counsel. You may expect of me anything save flight
and recantation. I will not fly, much less recant. So may the Lord Jesus Christ
strengthen me. For neither can be done without peril of piety and of the
salvation of many” (418). A sharper bull of excommunication was issued 3 Jan 1521
including, as expected, Luther, but also Hutten, Pirckheimer, and Spengler— “heretics.”
This included an exhortation to Charles V to do his duty. But, the grievance industry
informed the Diet, religiously, territorially, economically, and politically. The
Babylonian Captivity was a throw-down-the-gauntlet document. Rather than a remand
to Rome, Luther’s affair was referred to the Diet. Aleander, the legate, was unhappy.
Comments
Post a Comment