Evening Prayer (1662 Book of Common Prayer)
For
Psalm 18, Prof. Calvin notes that the visible church is a mixed multitude. The
history of saints and scoundrels. The book of Judges as a theme, we are
pondering. Ups-and-downs, but kept by the power of God alone.
ISBE
on Exodus: Prof. R. K. Harrison lands on quintessential authenticity of Exodus,
leaving room for soft grammatical, geographical updates, e.g. the NIV reworking
the KJV, as it were. Retaining the essence with very minor updates for intelligibility.
For
Genesis 2.4ff.: Prof. Keil is belaboring the creation of man as a breathing
creature made of dust.
For
Joshua 24, Joshua sounds the note about remaining depravities that obtain and
will continue despite the rousing reaffirmation and resounding promises of
fidelity at this covenant renewal service at Shechem. Not so fast, says Joshua.
For
Isaiah 6.9-13, Prof. Henry continued discussing the importance of the 10%, the
stem or root that remains, while the tree gets the axe and 90% are gonners.
ISBE
on Mark: Dr. R. P. Martin finished his discussion favoring Mark as the author.
A resounding vote on that one.
For
Mathew 5.13-16, Prof. Jamiesson talks about the effect of salt on restraining
corruption in life and churches.
For
Romans 3.1-8, Prof. Hodge again is exegetical mud that makes the exposition
difficult to follow. Prof. John Murray is better. God willing, we hope to
assemble 70 volumes on Romans and, God willing, to work this Epistle for the remainder
of life.
For
Revelation 16.1-7, Prof. Henry will recalibrate an iron-head, if possible. God
is sending those angels out from heaven to work woe and destruction.
EDT
on Higher Criticism: Prof. R. K. Harrison warns the speculations have come and
gone. Caution is the watchword. Prof. Schaff says somewhere that the 19th
century is the stage for one theory coming and dying, followed by another, ad
seriatim.
In
the Global Anglican, Matthew Paynes continues the argument that “perseverance
of the saints” is included in the Anglican formularies. This much: he’s putting
this on the map for review.
For
Systematic Theology (locus 2), Prof. Hodge shifts to a discussion of mysticism
in the middle ages, a period he says goes from Gregory 1 to the Reformation. An
huge subject.
For
Theology Proper (locus 2), Prof. Reymond continues the focus on the “Son of God”
and “Son of Man” passages, noting Christ’s Messianic Self-consciousness and
Self-disclosure.
For Ecclesiology
(locus 6), Prof. Berkhof focuses on the hard-fought battle for Christ as the
Head of the Church, notably our Scottish brothers and sisters, versus the State
Erastianism, notably, the English claims
For
ODCC: Papias (60-120ish AD), a friend of Polycarp and the Elder John, wrote a
5-volume commentary on the Gospels. Portions of that reappears in Irenaeus and
Eusebius.
For
Apostolic Christianity, Vol. 1 (0-100) Prof. Schaff spend time discussing
Hillel, Shammai and Gamaliel as rabbis.
For
Medieval Christianity, Vol. 4 (590-1073), Prof. Schaff offers negative views of
the Koran from varied writers. The charge of tedium, illiteracy, and repetition
accords with this scribe’s readings (twice) of the dull Koran.
For
the Swiss Reformation Vol. 8 (1519-1605), Prof. Schaff continues to describe
the 10-fold category of Calvin’s works.
For
Dr. Cranmer, Prof. MacCulloch continues to take notice of Cranmer’s marginalia—he
clearly does not like Luther’s hot tongue and evinces strong Conciliarist
views, something that runs through his theological development, including the
desire for a pan-Protestant, Conciliarist response to Trent. It never materialized.
For
the Creeds of Christendom, Prof. Schaff notes that the Vincentian Canon—everywhere,
over all times, by everyone—doesn’t apply at all to the 1854 decree of
Immaculate Conception or Vatican 1, 1870.
Comments
Post a Comment