15 October 2015 A.D. Why Contemporary Worship is Less than Biblical—an Introduction
15 October 2015 A.D. Why Contemporary Worship is Less than Biblical—an Introduction
Ruiz, Miquel. “Why Contemporary
Worship is Less than Biblical—an Introduction.” Brothers of John the Stedfast. 15 Oct 2015. http://steadfastlutherans.org/2015/10/why-contemporary-worship-is-less-than-biblical-an-introduction/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BJS+%28The+Brothers+of+John+the+Steadfast%29.
Accessed 15 Oct 2015.
Why Contemporary Worship is Less than Biblical – an
Introduction
Posted on October 15, 2015 by Miguel Ruiz
There have historically been two dominant approaches
to the determination of worship forms and substance within Protestantism, known
as the “normative principle of worship,” and the “regulative principle of
worship.” Summarized briefly, the normative principle states that
whatever the Scriptures do not forbid in worship may be permitted, and the
regulative principle states that only that which is directly prescribed by the
Scriptures may be allowed into a Christian worship service. The
“regulative” camp has typically been comprised of the Reformed, Presbyterians,
and the Puritans. They retain strong “anti-Catholic” sentiments which
usually causes the rejection of anything smelling of Rome on the basis that
since Scripture didn’t require it, it must therefore be tainted by or the
product of Roman err. Lutherans have always been considered followers of
the normative principle. We include many things in our worship services
that aren’t directly required by Scripture, and we have maintained continuity
with catholic tradition, so far as it rightly confesses Christ, for many
reasons: It shows our solidarity with the historic church, leads to unity
of expression, and these methods of tenacious Christo-centricity, Scripture
saturation, and Gospel centeredness have proven their mettle over time by successfully
transitioning the faith down through numerous generations.
However, for a salutary practice of the normative
principle, it must be recognized that two things do not necessarily
follow: First, no dancing bears. All things are lawful, but not all things are
beneficial. It is not a sin to have a dancing bear in your worship
service. It is just stupid. Inexcusably stupid. Second, it
does not follow that just because we allow what Scripture does
not explicitly forbid, that therefore what Scripture actually does
prescribe has become irrelevant. A true “normative-ist” is free to add to
the Biblical stipulations on worship, but he is not free to ignore what the
Scriptures say when they do address the issue.
Therefore, in normative worship, we must use all
that the “regulative-ists” apply (that what Scripture requires), and in
addition we are free to go beyond that and incorporate other things, so long as
they are beneficial. As adherents to the normative principle, Lutherans
have been reluctant to prescribe specific laws dictating what every Sunday
service must look like. But this does not give us the freedom to ignore
what the Bible does in fact require.
This is why, as a vocational church musician, I have
a hard time taking what most people describe as “contemporary worship” very
seriously, either as a faithful expression of Lutheran worship, or as something
that is good for the church. The Bible doesn’t often speak directly to the
specific details of what we should be doing on Sunday mornings, but when it
does, “contemporary worship” usually ignores, or at least minimizes these
instructions.
Before you write this off as a one-sided rant,
consider that I currently lead what many would describe as “contemporary
worship” on most weekends. President Harrison was, in my opinion, dead
right when he said that instrumentation is NOT the problem. I have a
background in Evangelicalism with a Charismatic approach to worship, and have participated
in leadership for contemporary worship at Lutheran and Evangelical
congregations large and small, from blended to traditional to “contemporvant”.
I know from whence I speak when I say that a wholesale endorsement of these
things is most certainly not good, right, or salutary for the church
today. These are some of the reasons I have left most of that circus
behind. I’m not talking about a black/white distinction where all traditional
stuff is automatically good, and all new stuff is automatically bad. I
recognize exceptions to every rule, and will give examples of them as I am
able.
The purpose of this series is to examine the
overarching tendencies of contemporary worship through the lens of scripture in
order to determine from the Word of God whether the common practice of it is
indeed something good for the church. In the following articles, we will
examine that which God has instructed us to do in worship, to consider what obedience
to this looks like, and examine whether particular approaches to worship are
faithful in this regard in a way that benefits the church, that we may be
steadfast in worship.
Comments
Post a Comment