30 September 420 A.D. Jerome Passes—Scholar, Exegete, Theologian, and Translator

30 September 420 A.D.  Jerome Passes—Scholar, Exegete, Theologian, and Translator

 

Burghardt, Walter John.  “Saint Jerome.”  Encyclopedia Britannica.  23 Sept 2014.  http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/302749/Saint-Jerome/3695/Later-literary-works.  Accessed 12 Jun 2014. 

Saint Jerome, Latin in full Eusebius Hieronymus, pseudonym Sophronius   (born c. 347, Stridon, Dalmatia—died 419/420, Bethlehem, Palestine), ; feast day September 30, biblical translator and monastic leader, traditionally regarded as the most learned of the Latin Fathers. He lived for a time as a hermit, became a priest, served as secretary to Pope Damasus, and about 389 established a monastery at Bethlehem. His numerous biblical, ascetical, monastic, and theological works profoundly influenced the early Middle Ages. He is known particularly for his Latin translation of the Bible, the Vulgate.

Early life.

Jerome was born of well-to-do Christian parents at Stridon, probably near the modern Ljubljana, Slovenia. His education, begun at home, was continued in Rome when he was about 12. There he studied grammar, rhetoric, and philosophy. A serious scholar, enamoured of Latin literature, he frequented the catacombs and near the end of his Roman education was baptized (c. 366), probably by Pope Liberius.

He spent the next 20 years in travel and impermanent residences. At Treveris (now Trier), he was profoundly attracted to monasticism. Possibly as early as 369 he was back in the vicinity of Stridon. In Aquileia (Italy) he was linked with an ascetic elite—including Rufinus, a writer and scholar, who translated the 3rd-century Alexandrian theologian Origen—grouped around Bishop Valerianus. When the group disbanded (c. 373), Jerome decided to go on a trip through the East. On reaching Antioch in 374, fatigued by travel and by inner conflict, he rested as guest of the priest Evagrius of Antioch and there may have composed his earliest known work, De septies percussa (“Concerning Seven Beatings”). There also, in mid-Lent 375, during a near-fatal illness, he had a celebrated dream. In that dream, in which he was dragged before a tribunal of the Lord, he was accused of being a Ciceronian—a follower of the 1st-century-bc Roman philosopher—rather than a Christian, and he was severely lashed; he vowed never again to read or possess pagan literature.

Long afterward, in controversy with Rufinus, Jerome minimized the dream’s importance, but for years it prevented him from reading the classics for pleasure, and at the time it was the cause of a genuine spiritual crisis. One result of the dream was his first exegetical (critical interpretive) work, an allegorical commentary on the biblical book Obadiah, which he disowned 21 years later as a youthful production of fervent ignorance.

In 375 Jerome began a two-year search for inner peace as a hermit in the desert of Chalcis. The experience was not altogether successful. A novice in spiritual life, he had no expert guide; speaking only Latin, he was confronted with Syriac and Greek; lonely, he begged for letters; a gourmet with a weak stomach, he found desert food a penance; desperate for peace, he was racked by passion. Yet, he claimed that he was genuinely happy. His response to temptation was incessant prayer and fasting; he learned Hebrew from a Jewish convert, studied Greek, had manuscripts copied for his library and his friends, and carried on a brisk correspondence.

The crisis arrived when Chalcis became involved with ecclesiastical and theological controversies centring on episcopal succession and Trinitarian (on the nature of the relationship of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) and christological (on the nature of Christ) disputes. Suspected of harbouring heretical views (i.e., Sabellianism, which emphasized God’s unity at the expense of the distinct persons), Jerome insisted that the answer to ecclesiastical and theological problems resided in oneness with the Roman bishop. Pope Damasus did not respond, and Jerome quit the desert for Antioch.

In Antioch his host, Evagrius, won Jerome over to the party of Bishop Paulinus, who was opposed by Basil, the great orthodox bishop of Caesarea and one of the three Cappadocian Fathers—the others being Gregory of Nazianzus and Gregory of Nyssa. Recognizing his importance—since Jerome was by now known as a scholar and a monastic figure of significance—Paulinus decided to ordain him. Jerome accepted (378) on two conditions: his monastic aspirations would not be prejudiced, and priestly functions would not be forced on him. He attended the exegetical lectures of Apollinaris of Laodicea and visited the Nazarenes (Jewish Christians) of Beroea to examine their copy of a Hebrew gospel purporting to be the original Gospel of Matthew.

Jerome spent almost three years (379–382) continuing his pursuit of scriptural studies. An enthusiastic disciple of Gregory of Nazianzus, Jerome also came to know Gregory of Nyssa and the theologian Amphilochius of Iconium at the Council of Constantinople (381). Under such influences he improved his knowledge of Greek and developed an admiration for Origen’s exegesis. He translated 14 of Origen’s homilies (sermons) on Old Testament books into Latin. Here too he translated the church historian Eusebius’ Chronicon (Chronicles) and continued it to the year 378.

But the most decisive influence on Jerome’s later life was his return to Rome (382–385) as secretary to Pope Damasus. There he pursued his scholarly work on the Bible and propagated the ascetic life. On Damasus’ urging he wrote some short exegetical tracts and translated two sermons of Origen on the Song of Solomon. More importantly, he revised the Old Latin version of the Gospels on the basis of the best Greek manuscripts at his command, and made his first, somewhat unsuccessful, revision of the Old Latin Psalter based on a few Septuagint (Greek translation of the Old Testament) manuscripts. He held classes for a monastic-minded circle of noble Roman widows and virgins (e.g., Marcella, Paula, and her daughters Blesilla and Eustochium). He taught them the Hebrew text of the Psalms, orally and in letters, he answered their biblical problems, and he was their master in spirituality as well. Under these conditions, he wrote a defense of the perpetual virginity of Mary, Jesus’ mother (383), and attacked the view of those who espoused the equality of virginity and marriage. But his preaching in support of the monastic life and his relationship with the ascetic coterie, his castigation of Roman clergy, lax monks, and hypocritical virgins, and his correction of the gospel text provoked such a storm of criticism and calumny, especially after Damasus’ death, in December 384, that in August 385 he left “Babylon” (Rome) in bitter indignation and made his way to the Holy Land.

In company with virgins led by Paula, Jerome made a religious and archaeological pilgrimage through all of Palestine and to the monastic centres of Egypt; he spent almost a month with the famed exegete Didymus in Alexandria.

The summer of 386 found him settled in Bethlehem. There, by 389, Paula finished a monastery for men under Jerome’s direction, three cloisters for women (forming one convent) under her own supervision, and a hostel for pilgrims. Here Jerome lived, except for brief journeys, until his death.

Later literary works.

The literary legacy of Jerome’s last 34 years (in Palestine) is the outgrowth of contemporary controversies, Jerome’s passion for Scripture, and his involvement in monastic life. The controversies were varied. An anti-Origen movement in the east, fanned by the anti-heretical bishop Epiphanius, turned Jerome not only against the views of Origen—whose 39 sermons on Luke he had translated c. 389–392—but against his friends Bishop John of Jerusalem and Rufinus. His petulance in early correspondence with St. Augustine, stemming from the African’s strictures on Jerome’s biblical efforts, imperilled their mutual respect. His catalog of Christian authors, De viris illustribus (“Concerning Illustrious Men”), was written in 392/393 to counter pagan pride in pagan culture. Against the monk Jovinian, who asserted the equality of virginity and marriage, he wrote a polemical diatribe Adversus Jovinianum (393) that was frequently brilliant but needlessly crude, excessively influenced by the 2nd- and 3rd-century theologian Tertullian, whose writings were at times unnecessarily harsh toward marriage. Against the priest Vigilantius, Jerome dictated in one night a defense of monasticism, clerical celibacy, and certain practices connected with the cult of martyrs (Contra Vigilantium, 406). The Pelagian problem—named for the heretical British monk Pelagius, who minimized the role of divine grace in man’s salvation—was transplanted to Palestine from Rome with the personal appearance of the author of this heresy, and it called forth Jerome’s finest controversial work, Dialogi contra Pelagianos (three books, 415), in which his use of fictitious interlocutors makes his arguments uncommonly impersonal.

Jerome’s biblical production in Bethlehem includes two introductory works helpful to biblical scholars: Liber locorum (“Book of Places”), a useful translation and adaptation of Eusebius’ work on Palestinian place-names; and Liber interpretationis Hebraicorum nominum (“Book of Interpretation of Hebrew Names”), an alphabetical list, with quite fanciful etymologies or origins, of Hebrew proper names in the Bible. Continuing his revision of the Old Latin version of the Septuagint based on Origen’s Hexapla (an edition with the Hebrew text in Hebrew and Greek characters, and four different Greek versions arranged in six parallel columns), he revised Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, the Song of Solomon, Chronicles, and Job, and to his Roman revision of the Psalms added Origen’s diacritical notes. Between 391 and 406 he produced a Latin translation of the Old Testament on the basis of the original text, a remarkable effort considering the slender instruments at his disposal and the opposition his project provoked. Jerome’s Bethlehem commentaries suffer at times from hasty composition, excessive dependence on his predecessors, and a predilection for allegorical interpretation. The Liber Hebraicarum quaestionum in Genesim (“Book of Hebrew Questions on Genesis”) gives an important place to geography, etymology, and rabbinic tradition (post-biblical Jewish scholarly views). He wrote short glosses (interpretations) on the Psalter and more scientific explanations of Psalms 10–16. His commentary on Ecclesiastes (c. 387) is a milestone in exegesis, because it is the first original Latin commentary that takes advantage of the Hebrew text. Perhaps Jerome’s best commentaries are on the minor and major prophets of the Old Testament. As for the New Testament, he explained Matthew, accenting the literal sense; he interpreted four of the Apostle Paul’s letters (Philemon, Galatians, Ephesians, Titus), with the stress on the allegorical interpretation; he recast the chiliastic commentary (on the view that Christ would return again and his followers would reign for 1,000 years) of Bishop Victorinus of Pettau (Austria), a Latin exegete martyred c. 304, on the Revelation to John. Many of his letters are tracts on exegetical problems, and he wrote homilies to monks under his direction on texts of Scripture.

Jerome’s ascetical interests at Bethlehem are mirrored not only in his controversies but in his life of Malchus, the monk captured by Bedouins; a biography of Hilarion, with its miracles and journeyings; a translation of Coptic ascetical works (e.g., the Rule of Pachomius); homilies to monks; and a significant segment of his correspondence.

Influence.

Jerome is remembered for his extensive erudition, especially his understanding of the classics, the Bible, and Christian tradition. In the art of the Renaissance he was frequently (and anachronistically) depicted dressed in the robes of a cardinal, a reflection of his stature as a model humanist. He was a learned scholar rather than a deep thinker, a sound traditionalist and not a speculative theologian, more competent as editor than as exegete. His career was a turbulent combination of scholarship and asceticism, and his correspondence is an exciting source for the historian, Scripture student, and theologian. His influence has been far-reaching and profound, on the early Middle Ages in particular: primarily through the Vulgate (the Latin version that he had translated), but importantly also through his work as an exegete and humanist and because he transmitted much of Greek thought to the West.