Paul's Epistle to the Romans: John Murray (#5): Romans 1.1-6

Among other observations by Prof. Murray, a vista opens up on the co-extensive and complementary points of apostolic doctrine and apostolic succession. The latter is a horrendously bold claim by Papists and some Anglicans (not all) about apostolic succession. Without apostolic doctrine, one is unauthorized to claim apostolic succession. One requires the other. To award Bishop Budde the title of standing in "apostolic succession" is a fiction since she so little reflects "apostolic doctrine," including her apostate claim that one need not believe in the historic resurrection to be a Christian. Pure tomfoolery in the Episcopal Church of the USA. Does anyone think St. Paul would allow her a role in church leadership? Point registered and taken. Goodbye Bishop Budde. 1.1 will be finished next time as 1.2ff is taken up.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

February 1229 A.D. Council of Toulouse--"We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament

February 1229 A.D.   Council of Toulouse-- "We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament" Wohlberg, Steve. “Papal Rome Against the Bible.”   White Horse Media. N.d. http://www.whitehorsemedia.com/articles/?d=99#.VJGcA8J0xjo .   Accessed 16 Dec 2014.   From the 1200s to the 1800s, Papal leaders openly condemned the reading of the Bible in the vernacular (the language of the common people) and even persecuted those caught with copies of the Scriptures in their possession. Because Bible Societies (beginning in the 1800's) won the war and have spread God's Word around the world, Rome has backed off of its previously public position. Yet the Vatican has not changed. Papal Rome's opposition to pure Bible truth remains to this day. Note these historical statements: At the Council of Toulouse (1229 A.D), papal church leaders ruled: "We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament ... We forbid them most severely
Read more

11 April 1803 A.D. France Offers to Sell Louisiana Territory to the US for $11.250 Million—Napoleon: “The sale assures forever the power of the United States…”

Image
11 April 1803 A.D. France Offers to Sell Louisiana Territory to the US for $11.250 Million—Napoleon: “The sale assures forever the power of the United States…” Editors. “ 1803 – In one of the great surprises in diplomatic history, French Foreign Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand makes an offer to sell all of Louisiana Territory to the United States. ” This Day in U.S. Military History. N.d. https://thisdayinusmilhist.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/april-11/ . Accessed 10 Apr 2015. 1803 – In one of the great surprises in diplomatic history, French Foreign Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand makes an offer to sell all of Louisiana Territory to the United States. Talleyrand was no fool. As the foreign minister to French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, he was one of the most powerful men in the world. Three years earlier, Talleyrand had convinced Napoleon that he could create a new French Empire in North America. The French had long had a tenuous claim to the vast area west of
Read more

8 May 1559 A.D. Act of Uniformity Passed—Elizabeth 1

Image
8 May 1559 A.D.   Act of Uniformity Passed—Elizabeth 1 Mann, Claire.   “Act of Uniformity.”   The Elizabeth Files.   8 May 2010. http://www.elizabethfiles.com/act-of-uniformity-1559/3833/ .   Accessed 24 Jun 2014. Act of Uniformity 1559 Posted By claire on May 8, 2010 On the 8th May 1559, Queen Elizabeth I gave her approval to the Acts of Uniformity and Supremacy which had been passed by Parliament on the 29th April. The Act of Uniformity made Protestantism England’s official faith, established a form of worship which is still followed in English Parish churches today and showed the country that Elizabeth was bent on following a middle road where religion was concerned. The Middle Road of Faith Elizabeth I was a keen Protestant, having been converted by her stepmother Catherine Parr, a zealous reformer, in her formative years in the 1540s, however, she was no Puritan or Calvinist and was against clerical marriage. Elizabeth had seen the damage that religious divis
Read more