Paul's Epistle to the Romans: John Murray (#5): Romans 1.1-6

Among other observations by Prof. Murray, a vista opens up on the co-extensive and complementary points of apostolic doctrine and apostolic succession. The latter is a horrendously bold claim by Papists and some Anglicans (not all) about apostolic succession. Without apostolic doctrine, one is unauthorized to claim apostolic succession. One requires the other. To award Bishop Budde the title of standing in "apostolic succession" is a fiction since she so little reflects "apostolic doctrine," including her apostate claim that one need not believe in the historic resurrection to be a Christian. Pure tomfoolery in the Episcopal Church of the USA. Does anyone think St. Paul would allow her a role in church leadership? Point registered and taken. Goodbye Bishop Budde. 1.1 will be finished next time as 1.2ff is taken up.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

February 1229 A.D. Council of Toulouse--"We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament

September 1209-1229 A.D. Remembering the Albigensian Crusade; Papal Indulgences & Passes Offered for In-life & Afterlife

11 April 1803 A.D. France Offers to Sell Louisiana Territory to the US for $11.250 Million—Napoleon: “The sale assures forever the power of the United States…”