Dr. Fitzsimons Allison's "The Rise of Moralism" (#16): Laud, Chillingwor...
BREAKING: Allison says "On the other hand, however, it is significant that neither Cosin nor Laud seemed to have considered the matter of soteriology as an important difference between the Church of England and the Church of Rome" (60). Yikes!
We know lil' Laud was an Arminian. But soterioligical differences between Canterbury and Rome were not important?
As A.A. Hodge rightly notes, Roman soteriology is Arminian soteriology. Again, the utterly gross failure of the Church of England, for whatever reasons, to adopt and codify the Synod of Dordt. The CoE's failure was never reversed and it shows today.
A HUGE point, if Bishop Allison is reading Laud aright. Had to reread the quote and context 4-5 times. The eyeballs were flashing here in moderation, equiposie and the Anglican quest for balance (a small joke).
HUGE!
Comments
Post a Comment