10 May 1886 A.D. Rev. Dr. Prof. Karl Barth Born in Basel, Switzerland
10
May 1886 A.D. Rev. Dr.
Prof. Karl Barth Born in Basel, Switzerland
“Karl Barth: Courageous Theologian.” Christianity Today. 8 Aug 2008. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/131christians/theologians/barth.html. Accessed 8 May 2014.
Karl Barth
Courageous
theologian
"Faith is awe in the presence of
the divine incognito; it is the love of God that is aware of the qualitative
difference between God and man and God and the world."
"The gospel is not a truth among other
truths. Rather, it sets a question mark against all truths." Karl Barth
not only said this, he spent his life setting question marks, in the name of
Christ, against all manner of "truths." In the process, he did
nothing less than alter the course of modern theology.
Timeline
|
|
|
1870
|
First Vatican Council declares papal
infallibility
|
|
1880
|
Abraham Kuyper starts Free University
|
|
1885
|
Wellhausen's documentary hypothesis
|
|
1886
|
Karl Barth born
|
|
1968
|
Karl Barth dies
|
|
1974
|
Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization
|
Shocking liberalism
He started out life conventionally enough: he was
born in Basel, Switzerland, the son of Fritz Barth (pronounced
"bart"), a professor of New Testament and early church history at
Bern, and Anna Sartorius. He studied at some of the best universities: Bern,
Berlin, Tübingen, and Marburg. At Berlin he sat under the famous liberals of
the day (like historian Adolph von Harnack), most of whom taught an optimistic
Christianity that focused not so much on Jesus Christ and the Cross as the
fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.
After serving a Geneva curacy from 1909 to 1911,
Barth was appointed to a working-class parish in Switzerland, and in 1913 he
married Nell Hoffman, a talented violinist (they eventually had one daughter
and four sons).
As he pastored, he noted with alarm that Germany
was becoming increasingly militaristic and that his former professors were
supportive of this. Barth, dismayed with the moral weakness of liberal
theology, plunged into a study of the Bible, especially Paul's Epistle to the
Romans. He also visited Moravian preacher Christoph Frederick Blumhardt and
came away with an overwhelming conviction about the victorious reality of
Christ's resurrection—which deeply influenced his theology.
Out of this emerged his Commentary
on the Epistle to the Romans (1919). He sounded themes that had been
muted in liberal theology. Liberal theology had domesticated God into the
patron saint of human institutions and values. Instead, Barth wrote of the
"crisis," that is, God's judgment under which all the world stood; he
pounded on the theme of God's absolute sovereignty, of his complete freedom in
initiating his revelation in Jesus Christ.
He spoke dialectically, in paradox, to shock
readers into seeing the radicalness of the gospel: "Faith is awe in the
presence of the divine incognito; it is the love of God that is aware of the
qualitative difference between God and man and God and the world."
The first of six heavily revised editions
followed in 1922. It rocked the theological community. Barth later wrote,
"As I look back upon my course, I seem to myself as one who, ascending the
dark staircase of a church tower and trying to steady himself, reached for the
banister, but got hold of the bell rope instead. To his horror he had then to
listen to what the great bell had sounded over him and not over him alone."
Liberal theologians gasped in horror and attacked Barth furiously. But Barth
had given that form of liberalism a mortal wound.
His theology came to be known as
"dialectical theology," or "the theology of crisis"; it
initiated a trend toward neo-orthodoxy in Protestant theology.
In 1921 Barth was appointed professor of Reformed
theology at the University of Göttingen, and later to chairs at Münster (1925)
and Bonn (1930). He published works critiquing nineteenth-century Protestant
theology and produced a celebrated study of Anselm. In 1931 he began the first
book of his massive Church Dogmatics. It grew year
by year out of his class lectures; though incomplete, it eventually filled four
volumes in 12 parts, printed with 500 to 700 pages each. Many pastors in the
1930s, '40s, and '50s, desperate for an antidote to liberalism, eagerly awaited
the publication of each book.
Fascist idolatry
Barth fought not just with liberals but allies
who challenged some of his extreme conclusions. When Emil Brunner proposed that
God revealed himself not just in the Bible but in nature as well (though not in
a saving way), Barth replied in 1934 with an article titled, "No! An
Answer to Emil Brunner." Barth believed that such a "natural
theology" was the root of the religious syncretism and anti-Semitism of
the "German Christians"—those who supported Hitler's national
socialism.
By this time, Barth was immersed in the German
church struggle. He was a founder of the so-called Confessing Church, which
reacted vigorously against the ideology of "blood and soil" and the
Nazis' attempt to create a "German Christian" church. The 1934 Barmen
Declaration, largely written by Barth, pitted the revelation of Jesus Christ
against the "truth" of Hitler and national socialism:
"Jesus Christ … is the one Word of God. … We
reject the false doctrine, as though the Church could and would have to
acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and beside this one
Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God's revelation."
When Barth refused to take the oath of
unconditional allegiance to the Führer, he was fired. He was offered the chair
of theology in his native Basel, however, and from there he continued to
champion the causes of the Confessing Church, the Jews, and oppressed people
everywhere.
Pastor Karl
After the war, Barth engaged in controversies
regarding baptism (though a Reformed theologian, he rejected infant baptism),
hermeneutics, and the demythologizing program of Rudolf Bultmann (which denied
the historical nature of Scripture, instead believing it a myth whose meaning
could heal spiritual anxiety).
Barth also made regular visits to the prison in
Basel, and his sermons to the prisoners, Deliverance to
the Captives, reveal his unique combination of evangelical passion and
social concern that characterized all his life.
When asked in 1962 (on his one visit to America)
how he would summarize the essence of the millions of words he had published,
he replied, "Jesus loves me this I know, for the Bible tells me so."
Though Barth made it possible for theologians
again to take the Bible seriously, American evangelicals have been skeptical of
Barth because he refused to consider the written Word "infallible"
(he believed only Jesus was). Others gave up on Barth's theology because it
overemphasized God's transcendance (to the point that some former Barthians
began championing the "death of God"). Nonetheless, he remains the
most important theologian of the twentieth century.
Comments
Post a Comment