15 May 1984 A.D. Apologist Francis Schaeffer Passes This World


15 May 1984 A.D.  Apologist Francis Schaeffer Passes This World

He is most famous for his writings and his establishment of the L'Abri community in Switzerland. Opposed to theological modernism, Schaeffer promoted a more historic Protestant faith and a presuppositional approach to Christian apologetics which he believed would answer the questions of the age.

Schaeffer's wife, Edith (Seville) Schaeffer, became a prolific author in her own right.[2] Schaeffer was also the father of—initially a collaborator with, and after his death the object of criticism from—Frank Schaeffer, an author, film-maker and painter.

Contents 

Biography

Schaeffer was born on January 30, 1912, in Germantown, Pennsylvania to Franz A. Schaeffer III and Bessie Williamson.[3]

In 1935, Schaeffer graduated magna cum laude from Hampden-Sydney College. The same year he married Edith Seville, the daughter of missionary parents who had been with China Inland Mission founded by Hudson Taylor. Schaeffer then enrolled at Westminster Theological Seminary in the fall and studied under Cornelius Van Til (presuppositional apologetics) and J. Gresham Machen (doctrine of inerrancy).[4]

In 1937, Schaeffer transferred to Faith Theological Seminary, graduating in 1938. This seminary was newly formed as a result of a split between the Presbyterian Church of America (now the Orthodox Presbyterian Church) and the Bible Presbyterian Church, a Presbyterian denomination more identified with Fundamentalist Christianity and premillennialism. Schaeffer was the first student to graduate and the first to be ordained in the Bible Presbyterian Church. He served pastorates in Pennsylvania (Grove City and Chester) and St. Louis, Missouri. Schaeffer eventually sided with the Bible Presbyterian Church Columbus Synod following the BPC Collingswood & BPC Columbus Split & became a part of the Reformed Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod, when the Bible Presbyterian Church Columbus Synod merged with Reformed Presbyterian Church Columbus Synod in 1965,[5] a denomination which would merge with the Presbyterian Church in America, in 1982.

In 1948, the Schaeffer family moved to Switzerland and in 1955 established the community called L'Abri (French for "the shelter").[1][6] Serving as both a philosophy seminar and a spiritual community, L’Abri attracted thousands of young people, and was later expanded into Sweden, France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States.

In 1954, Schaeffer was awarded the honorary Doctor of Divinity degree from Highland College in Long Beach, California.[7]

In 1971, Schaeffer received the honorary Doctor of Letters degree from Gordon College in Wenham, Massachusetts.[8]

In 1982, John Warwick Montgomery nominated Schaeffer for an honorary Doctor of Laws degree, which was conferred in 1983 by the Simon Greenleaf School of Law, Anaheim, California in recognition of his apologetic writings and ministry.[9]

Schaeffer died of lymphoma on May 15, 1984, in Rochester, Minnesota.[10][11]

Family relationships

In contrast to Schaeffer's own experience as a single child of a father with a third-grade education and a depressed mother, he grew up with a drive to understand reality in its complexity, including the glorious and tragic human realities. He was deeply engaged in the lives of each of his four children, continuously available to them, showing and explaining art, history, city and country life, philosophy, Roman ruins and medieval and Renaissance efforts to civilize a damaged human history. He enjoyed watching people, engaging them in conversation and showing his children the joy and tragedy of human existence. He laid out for them the philosophic foundations of societies without being idealistic about any of them.[citation needed]

In Crazy for God, Schaeffer's son Frank presents a portrait of his father that is far more nuanced and multi-dimensional than was suggested by his public persona. He states, for example, that Schaeffer's primary passions in life were not the Bible and theology but rather art and culture. "And what moved him was not theology but beauty".[12] Schaeffer's son claims he had frequent bouts with depression and a verbally and physically abusive relationship with his wife, Edith.[13] Those in the inner circle at L'Abri challenge Frank's account. Os Guinness, who lived with the Schaeffers and was a close friend of both the younger and elder Schaeffer, described Crazy for God as a "scurrilous caricature" and said, "[N]o one should take Frank's allegations at face value."[14]

Apologetics

Schaeffer's approach to Christian apologetics was primarily influenced by Herman Dooyeweerd,[not in citation given] Edward John Carnell, and Cornelius Van Til, but he was not known to be a strict presuppositionalist in the Van Tillian tradition. His approach to culture was heavily influenced by his friendship with Hans Rookmaaker. In a 1948 article in The Bible Today, Schaeffer explained his own apologetics and how he walked a middle path between evidentialism and presuppositionalism, noting that "If the unsaved man was consistent he would be an atheist in religion, an irrationalist in philosophy (including a complete uncertainty concerning 'natural laws'), and completely a-moral in the widest sense."[15] J. Budziszewski summarizes the article about this middle path approach by writing:

Presuppositionalists, he held, are right to assert that the ultimate premises of Christian and anti–Christian systems of thought are utterly at odds in relation to their origin. On the other hand, evidentialists are right to assert that between Christian and anti–Christian systems of thought there is always a point of contact in the shape of reality itself. The reason for this point of contact, he argued, is that nonbelievers cannot bring themselves to be completely consistent with their own presuppositions, and this inconsistency is a result of what many call common grace and is in fact the reality of God having made, and spoken into, a defined and unavoidable creation. "Thus, illogically," he wrote, "men have in their accepted worldviews various amounts of that which is ours. But, illogical though it may be, it is there and we can appeal to it."[16]

Schaeffer came to use this middle path as the basis for his method of evangelism which he called Taking the roof off.[17] An example of Taking the roof off in written form can be found in Schaeffer's work entitled Death in the City.[18] Nancy Pearcey also describes two books by Schaeffer, Escape From Reason and The God Who Is There in this way:

In these books, Schaeffer explains the history of the two-story division of knowledge, often referred to as the fact/value split. He also describes his apologetics method, which combined elements of both evidentialism and presuppositionalism.[19]

Influence of Rushdoony


In the 1960s Schaeffer read the works of Reconstructionist theologian Rousas John Rushdoony with appreciation, and according to Barry Hawkins, "it is quite likely that Schaeffer’s belief that the United States was founded on a Christian base came in part from Rushdoony."[3] Schaeffer later lost this fervor because Rushdoony was a postmillennialist (holding the doctrine that the kingdom of God will be built on earth before the second coming of Jesus) while Schaeffer was a premillennialist (holding that the kingdom of God will only be ushered in with the second coming). Further Schaeffer thought that Rushdoony’s system would require a merger of church and state, which he opposed. He held that the principles, not the actual details, of Old Testament civil law were applicable under the New Covenant of Jesus. He wrote "The moral law [of the Old Testament], of course, is constant, but the civil law only was operative for the Old Testament theocracy. I do not think there is any indication of a theocracy in the New Testament until Christ returns as king."[3]

Legacy
 

Today, roughly twenty-five years after his death (from lymphoma), his teachings continue in the same informal setting at The Francis A. Schaeffer Foundation in Gryon, Switzerland. It is led by one of his daughters and sons-in-law as a small-scale alternative to the original L'Abri Fellowship International which is still operating in nearby Huemoz-sur-Ollon and other places in the world. On the other hand, Schaeffer's son Frank Schaeffer initially supported his father's ideas and political program, but has since distanced himself from many of those views and has converted to the Eastern Orthodox Church.[20]

Covenant Theological Seminary has established the Francis A. Schaeffer Institute directed by a former English L'Abri member, Jerram Barrs. The purpose of the school is to train Christians to demonstrate compassionately and defend reasonably what they see as the claims of Christ on all of life.[21]

Institute of Church Leadership


Francis Schaeffer’s work and legacy continues today. In 1978, Schaeffer asked a group of Reformed Episcopal Clergy to research his thoughts and current trends, forming a church guild called “The Society of Reformed Philosophical Thinkers” that later in 1988 merged with “Into Thy Word Ministries,” also envisioned by Schaeffer, and then the remnants of the “Charles E. Fuller Institute” in 1998 were merged forming, “The Francis A. Schaeffer Institute of Church Leadership Development.” Its purpose is continuing the work which started in Carmel California as a think-tank and Bible literacy project, currently in Pasadena, Ca. This endeavor came into fruition the late 70's by Schaeffer’s personal bible study at L’Abri and his lectures worldwide which inspired a vision to strategize how to reach and train pastors and church leaders to focus on Christ centered principles. The vision continues for over thirty years and calls for a commitment to point the church back to “true-Truth” and “true spirituality” onto the path of making disciples. For the last twenty years they have been doing church and bible research in a deep doctoral level, not snapshots and phone surveys and publish comprehensive studies. And with ministry partners, develop comprehensive curriculums and equipping helps for pastors, church planters and church leaders. “It is our passion and directive to lead Christians away from our false perceptions and into His way.”[citation needed]

Schaeffer popularized, in the modern context, a conservative, though not a fully Calvinist (Reformed) perspective.[citation needed]

Political activism


Francis Schaeffer is credited[by whom?] with helping spark a return to political activism among Protestant evangelicals and fundamentalists in the late 1970s and early 1980s, especially in relation to the issue of abortion. In his memoir Crazy for God, Schaeffer's son Frank takes credit for pressing his father to take on the abortion issue, which Schaeffer initially considered "too political."[13] Schaeffer called for a challenge to what he saw as the increasing influence of secular humanism. Schaeffer's views were expressed in two works, his book entitled A Christian Manifesto, as well as the book and film series, Whatever Happened to the Human Race?.[citation needed]

A Christian Manifesto


Schaeffer's A Christian Manifesto[22] was published in 1981. The name of the book is intended to position its thesis as a Christian answer to The Communist Manifesto of 1848 and the Humanist Manifesto documents of 1933 and 1973. Schaeffer's diagnosis is that the decline of Western Civilization is due to society having become increasingly pluralistic, resulting in a shift "away from a world view that was at least vaguely Christian in people’s memory... toward something completely different". Schaeffer argues that there is a philosophical struggle between the people of God and the secular humanists.[improper synthesis?]

In a sermon also titled "A Christian Manifesto", Schaeffer defines secular humanism as the worldview where "man is the measure of all things," and in the book he claims that critics of the Christian right miss the mark by confusing the "humanist religion" with humanitarianism, the humanities, or love of humans. He describes the conflict with secular humanism as a battle in which "these two religions, Christianity and humanism, stand over against each other as totalities." He writes that the decline of commitment to objective truth that he perceives in the various institutions of society is "not because of a conspiracy, but because the church has forsaken its duty to be the salt of the culture." Schaeffer explains:[23]

A true Christian in Hitler's Germany and in the occupied countries should have defied the false and counterfeit state and hidden his Jewish neighbors from the German SS Troops. The government had abrogated its authority, and it had no right to make any demands.

He then suggests that similar tactics be used to stop abortion. But Schaeffer argues he is not talking about a theocracy:

State officials must know that we are serious about stopping abortion,... First, we must make definite that we are in no way talking about any kind of theocracy. Let me say that with great emphasis. Witherspoon, Jefferson, the American Founders had no idea of a theocracy. That is made plain by the First Amendment, and we must continually emphasize the fact that we are not talking about some kind, or any kind, of a theocracy.[24]

Christian Reconstructionists Gary North and David Chilton were highly critical of A Christian Manifesto and Schaeffer.[25]

Their critical comments were prompted, they wrote, by the popularity of Schaeffer's book.[26] They suggested that Schaeffer supports pluralism because he sees the First Amendment as freedom of religion for all; and they themselves reject pluralism.[27] Pointing out negative statements Schaeffer made about theocracy, North and Chilton then explain why they promote it.[28] They extend their criticism of Schaeffer:

"The fact remains that Dr. Schaeffer’s manifesto offers no prescriptions for a Christian society. We mention that merely in the interests of clarity, for we are not sure that anybody has noticed it up to now. The same comment applies to all of Dr. Schaeffer’s writings: he does not spell out the Christian alternative.(pp. 127-28; emphasis North and Chilton)"

Influence on Christian Conservatives


Christian conservative leaders such as Tim LaHaye have credited Schaeffer for influencing their theological arguments urging political participation by evangelicals.[29]

Beginning in the 1990s, critics began exploring the intellectual/ideological connection between Schaeffer’s political activism and writings of the early 1980s to contemporary religious-political trends in the Christian Right, sometimes grouped under the name Dominionism, with mixed conclusions.[citation needed]

Sara Diamond and Frederick Clarkson[30] have written articles tracing the activism of numerous key figures in the Christian Right to the influence of Francis Schaeffer. According to Diamond: "The idea of taking dominion over secular society gained widespread currency with the 1981 publication of...Schaeffer's book A Christian Manifesto. The book sold 290,000 copies in its first year, and it remains one of the movement's most frequently cited texts."[31] Diamond summarizes the book and its importance to the Christian Right:

In A Christian Manifesto, Schaeffer's argument is simple. The United States began as a nation rooted in Biblical principles. But as society became more pluralistic, with each new wave of immigrants, proponents of a new philosophy of secular humanism gradually came to dominate debate on policy issues. Since humanists place human progress, not God, at the center of their considerations, they pushed American culture in all manner of ungodly directions, the most visible results of which included legalized abortion and the secularization of the public schools. At the end of -- A Christian Manifesto, Schaeffer calls for Christians to use civil disobedience to restore Biblical morality, which explains Schaeffer's popularity with groups like Operation Rescue. Randall Terry has credited Schaeffer as a major influence in his life.[31]

Frederick Clarkson explains that this had practical applications:

"Francis Schaeffer is widely credited with providing the impetus for Protestant evangelical political action against abortion. For example, Randall Terry, the founder of Operation Rescue, says: "You have to read Schaeffer's Christian Manifesto if you want to understand Operation Rescue." Schaeffer, a longtime leader in Rev. Carl McIntire's splinter denomination, the Bible Presbyterian Church, was a reader of Reconstructionist literature but has been reluctant to acknowledge its influence. Indeed, Schaeffer and his followers specifically rejected the modern application of Old Testament law."[32]

Analyses of Schaeffer as the major intellectual influence on Dominionism can be found in the works of authors such as Diamond[33] and Chip Berlet.[34] Other authors argue against a close connection with dominionism, for example Irving Hexham of the University of Calgary, who maintains that Schaeffer's political position has been misconstrued as advocating the Dominionist views of R. J. Rushdoony, who is a Christian Reconstructionist. Hexham indicates that Schaeffer's essential philosophy was derived from Herman Dooyeweerd, not Rushdoony, and that Hans Rookmaaker introduced Schaeffer to his writings.[35] Dooyeweerd was a Dutch legal scholar and philosopher, following in the footsteps of Neo-Calvinist Abraham Kuyper.

Congresswoman and 2012 United States presidential candidate Michele Bachmann has cited Schaeffer's documentary series How Should We Then Live? as having a "profound influence" on her life and that of her husband Marcus.[36]

Writings


Francis A. Schaeffer wrote twenty-two books, which cover a range of spiritual issues. They can be roughly split into five sections, as in the edition of his Complete Works (ISBN 0-89107-347-7):

  • A Christian View of Philosophy and Culture: The first three books in this block are known as Schaeffer's "trilogy," laying down the apologetical, philosophical, epistemological, and theological foundation for all his work.
  • A Christian View of the Bible as Truth
    • Genesis in Space and Time: Argues that the historical (as opposed to literalist or figurative) view of Genesis as historically true is fundamental to the Christian faith.
    • No Final Conflict
    • Joshua and the Flow of Biblical History
    • Basic Bible Studies: Biblical studies on the fundamentals of the faith.
    • Art and the Bible
  • A Christian View of Spirituality
    • No Little People: Argues that Christians should never despair of having a significant life of realizations, small as they seem to be.
    • True Spirituality: The spiritual foundation for Schaeffer's work, as a complement to the theological and philosophical approach of most other books. Useful for gaining a balanced view of the whole of Schaeffer's life and ministry.
    • The New Super-Spirituality: Claims the intellectual decadence of students and the counter-culture from the late sixties to the early seventies can be traced back to the conformism of their fathers, only with fewer moral absolutes, and predicts the contamination of the church. Offers an analysis of Postmodernism.
    • Two Contents, Two Realities: First presented as a position paper at the First International Congress on World Evangelization at Lausanne, Switzerland in 1974.
  • A Christian View of the Church
  • A Christian View of the West

In addition to his books, one of the last public lectures Schaeffer delivered was at the Law Faculty, University of Strasbourg. It was published as "Christian Faith and Human Rights", The Simon Greenleaf Law Review, 2 (1982–83) pp. 3–12. Most of his writings during his Bible Presbyterian days have not been collected, nor reprinted in decades.

In addition to the five volume Complete Works listed above there were also two books by Dr. Schaeffer published after his death:

  • Dennis, Lane T. (ed) Letters of Francis A. Schaeffer, Crossway Books, Westchester, 1985.
  • Schaeffer, Francis A. The Finished Work of Christ: The Truth of Romans 1–8, Crossway Books, Wheaton, 1998.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/BillyZeoli.png/180px-BillyZeoli.pngFilms


Billy Zeoli speaking from the podium at the National Religious Broadcasters Annual Congressional Breakfast, January 28, 1975. Courtesy of the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.

Schaeffer was eventually persuaded to adapt his book How Should We Then Live? The Rise and Decline of Western Thought and Culture to film by Gospel Films, Inc. by CEO and executive evangelical media producer Billy Zeoli who pitched the idea of hiring Schaeffer's then recently married son, teenage father, and painter Frank Schaeffer as a producer for the film project. Zeoli was instrumental in providing the Schaeffers with introductions to wealthy Americans evangelicals who would eventually bankroll the How We Should Then Live film project.

The American distribution of the How Should We Then Live: The Rise and Decline of Western Thought and Culture book, the U.S. distribution of the film of the same title by Zeoli's Gospel Films, Inc., and subsequent film tour in the United States by the Schaeffers was responsible for bringing many evangelical Protestants into the then largely Roman Catholic public protest movement against the United States Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) supporting legal abortion in the United States.

  • How Should We Then Live? The Rise and Decline of Western Thought and Culture (1976). Frank Schaeffer produced his father Francis Schaeffer's film series, which was released with a book by the same title.
  • Whatever Happened to the Human Race? (1979). A Christian response to abortion, euthanasia, and infanticide, narrated by Francis Schaeffer and former Surgeon General Dr. C. Everett Koop; it was released with a book by the same title.

Notes


1.       ^ Jump up to: a b Biographical Sketch, in Francis August Schaeffer Papers section, at PCA Historical Center. Retrieved 2006-08-26.

2.       Jump up ^ List of works by Edith Schaeffer, Amazon .

3.       ^ Jump up to: a b c Hankins, Barry (2008). Francis Schaeffer and the Shaping of Evangelical America. Eerdmans. 

4.       Jump up ^ Duriez, Colin; Francis Schaeffer: An Authentic Life (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 2008), p. 34

5.       Jump up ^ Francis A. Schaeffer, "A Step Forward", The Presbyterian Journal, 6 March 1974, pp.7-8. Retrieved 7 September 2007.

6.       Jump up ^ Michael S. Hamilton, "The Dissatisfaction of Francis Schaeffer," Christianity Today, 3 March 1997, Vol. 41, No. 3, Page 22. Reprinted at A Tribute to Mark Heard.. Retrieved 2006-08-25.

7.       Jump up ^ Schaeffer, Frank, Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back, Da Capo Press, 2007.

8.       Jump up ^ Douglas, J. D. Douglas & Philip Wesley Comfort, Editors, Who's Who in Christian History (Tyndale House Publishers, 1992), p. 609; Francis August Schaeffer Papers [Early Ministry] Manuscript Collection # 29 , Box 134, PCA Historical Center <http://www.pcahistory.org/findingaids/schaeffer/index.html>.

9.       Jump up ^ Parkhurst, LG (1985), "Appendix A: Chronology of the Life of Francis Schaeffer", Francis Schaeffer: The Man and His Message, Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, pp. 213–15 .

10.    Jump up ^ Duriez, Colin; Francis Schaeffer: An Authentic Life (Crossway Books, 2008), p. 210

11.    Jump up ^ Saxon, Wolfgang, "Rev. Francis A. Schaeffer, 72; Founder Of Spiritual Centers", New York Times, May 17, 1984.

12.    Jump up ^ Schaeffer 2007, p. 140.

13.    ^ Jump up to: a b Schaeffer, Frank (September 2007), Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back, New York: Carol & Graf, ISBN 978-0-7867-1891-7 .

14.    Jump up ^ Guinness, Os (March–April 2008). "Fathers and Sons: On Francis Schaeffer, Frank Schaeffer, and Crazy for God". Books & Culture. Retrieved 2008-05-23. 

15.    Jump up ^ Schaeffer, Francis, "A Review of a Review", in The Bible Today, October 1948, pp. 7–9. Accessed 2006-08-21. Reprinted at PCA Historical Center.

16.    Jump up ^ Budziszewski, J (May 2000), Evidentialists and Presuppositionalists – Replies, "Correspondence", First Things, retrieved 2006-08-21 .

17.    Jump up ^ Edgar, William (Spring 1995), "Two Christian Warriors: Cornelius Van Til and Francis A. Schaeffer Compared", Westminster Theological Journal 57 (1): 57–80 .

18.    Jump up ^ Schaeffer, Francis, "Chapter 9: The Universe and Two Chairs," in Death in the City, reprinted at Nehemiah's Prayer Watch. Retrieved August 22, 2006.

19.    Jump up ^ Pearcey, Nancy (2004), Total Truth: Liberating Christianity From Its Cultural Captivity, Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, p. 453 .

20.    Jump up ^ Ethics daily .

21.    Jump up ^ "Our Purpose", FSI, Covenant seminary, retrieved 2006-08-26 .

22.    Jump up ^ Francis Schaeffer, 1982, A Christian Manifesto, (revised edition),Crossway Books. ISBN 0-89107-233-0

23.    Jump up ^ Schaeffer, Francis (1982). "A Christian Manifesto.". Retrieved 2005-06-24.

24.    Jump up ^ Schaeffer, Francis, A Christian Manifesto, in The Collected Works... Volume 5, pp. 485–86.

25.    Jump up ^ North, Gary; Chilton, David (1983), "Apologetics and Strategy", in North, Gary, Tactics of Christian Resistance: A Symposium, Tyler, TX: Geneva Divinity School, pp. 100–40 .

26.    Jump up ^ North & Chilton 1983, pp. 116–17.

27.    Jump up ^ North & Chilton 1983, pp. 128–29.

28.    Jump up ^ North & Chilton 1983, pp. 121–22.

29.    Jump up ^ Tim LaHaye, 1980, The Battle for the Mind, Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell, p. 5

30.    Jump up ^ Clarkson, Frederick (1994). "Theocratic Dominionism Gains Influence". The Public Eye Magazine VIII (1 & 2).

31.    ^ Jump up to: a b Diamond, Sara (1994). "Dominion Theology: The Truth About the Christian Right's Bid for Power," Z Magazine (column) February 1995. Publiceye.org.

32.    Jump up ^ Clarkson, Frederick. (1995). “Christian Reconstructionism: Theocratic Dominionism Gains Influence.” In Chip Berlet (Ed.), Eyes Right! Challenging the Right Wing Backlash (pp. 59–80). Boston: South End Press. Revised and included in Clarkson, Eternal Hostility. Publiceye.org

33.    Jump up ^ Sara Diamond, 1995, Roads to Dominion: Right–Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States, New York: Guilford, pp. 246-249.

34.    Jump up ^ Chip Berlet and Matthew N. Lyons, 2000, Right–Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 212-213.

35.    Jump up ^ Hexham, Irving, "The Evangelical Response to the New Age," in Perspectives on the New Age, edited by James R. Lewis & J. Gordon Melton, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1992, pp. 152-163, and especially p. 322 Note 16.

36.    Jump up ^ Lizza, Ryan, "Leap of Faith: The making of a Republican front-runner", New Yorker Magazine, August 15, 2011.

Further reading


  • Boa, Kenneth D., and Robert M. Bowman, Faith Has Its Reasons: An Integrative Approach to Defending Christianity, NAV Press, Colorado Springs, 2001.
  • Burson, Scott R. and Jerry L. Walls. C.S. Lewis and Francis Schaeffer: Lessons for a New Century from the Most Influential Apologists of Our Time. Leicester: InterVarsity Press, 1998.
  • Coward, Harold., Pluralism: The Challenge to World Religions, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, 1986.
  • Cunningham, Stuart, "Towards A Critique of Francis Schaeffer's Thought", Interchange, 24 (1978) pp. 205–21.
  • Dennis, Lane T. (ed) Francis A. Schaeffer: Portraits of the Man and His Work, Crossway, Westchester, 1986.
  • Duriez, Colin, Francis Schaeffer: An Authentic Life, Crossway, Wheaton, 2008.
  • Follis, Bryan A., Truth With Love: Apologetics of Francis Schaeffer, Crossway, Wheaton, 2006.
  • Fowler, Robert Booth, A New Engagement: Evangelical Political Thought 1966-1976, William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1982.
  • Hankins, Barry, Francis Schaeffer And the Shaping of Evangelical America, Wm. B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 2008.
  • Hexham, Irving, "The Evangelical Response to the New Age," in Perspectives on the New Age, edited by James R. Lewis & J. Gordon Melton, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1992, pp. 152–63.
  • Kubsch, Ron, ed. (2007), Wahrheit und Liebe: Was wir von Francis Schaeffer für die Gegenwart lernen können (in German), Bonn: VKW .
  • Morris, Thomas V., Francis Schaeffer's Apologetics: A Critique, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 1987.
  • Parkhurst, Louis Gifford, Francis Schaeffer: The Man and His Message, Tyndale House, Wheaton, 1985.
  • ——— (1996), Francis & Edith Schaeffer, Minneapolis: Bethany House .
  • Ramsey, George W., The Quest for the Historical Israel, SCM Press, London, 1982, pp. 107–15.
  • Roper, D. L., "A Sympathetic Criticism of Francis Schaeffer's Writings," Interchange, 41 (1987) pp. 41–55.
  • Ruegsegger, Ronald W, ed. (1986), Reflections on Francis Schaeffer, Grand Rapids: Zondervan .
  • Schaeffer, Frank (2007), Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back, Da Capo Press .
  • Stadler, G Thomas (June 1989), "Renaissance Humanism: Francis Schaeffer Versus Some Contemporary Scholars", Fides et Historia 2: 4–20 .

External links


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

February 1229 A.D. Council of Toulouse--"We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament

February 1229 A.D.   Council of Toulouse-- "We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament" Wohlberg, Steve. “Papal Rome Against the Bible.”   White Horse Media. N.d. http://www.whitehorsemedia.com/articles/?d=99#.VJGcA8J0xjo .   Accessed 16 Dec 2014.   From the 1200s to the 1800s, Papal leaders openly condemned the reading of the Bible in the vernacular (the language of the common people) and even persecuted those caught with copies of the Scriptures in their possession. Because Bible Societies (beginning in the 1800's) won the war and have spread God's Word around the world, Rome has backed off of its previously public position. Yet the Vatican has not changed. Papal Rome's opposition to pure Bible truth remains to this day. Note these historical statements: At the Council of Toulouse (1229 A.D), papal church leaders ruled: "We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament ... We forbid them most severely
Read more

11 April 1803 A.D. France Offers to Sell Louisiana Territory to the US for $11.250 Million—Napoleon: “The sale assures forever the power of the United States…”

Image
11 April 1803 A.D. France Offers to Sell Louisiana Territory to the US for $11.250 Million—Napoleon: “The sale assures forever the power of the United States…” Editors. “ 1803 – In one of the great surprises in diplomatic history, French Foreign Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand makes an offer to sell all of Louisiana Territory to the United States. ” This Day in U.S. Military History. N.d. https://thisdayinusmilhist.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/april-11/ . Accessed 10 Apr 2015. 1803 – In one of the great surprises in diplomatic history, French Foreign Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand makes an offer to sell all of Louisiana Territory to the United States. Talleyrand was no fool. As the foreign minister to French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, he was one of the most powerful men in the world. Three years earlier, Talleyrand had convinced Napoleon that he could create a new French Empire in North America. The French had long had a tenuous claim to the vast area west of
Read more

September 1209-1229 A.D. Remembering the Albigensian Crusade; Papal Indulgences & Passes Offered for In-life & Afterlife

Image
  September 1209-1229 A.D.   Remembering the Albigensian Crusade;   Papal Indulgences & Passes Offered for In-life & Afterlife Baldwin, Marshall W.   “Albigensian Crusade.”   Encyclopedia Britannica .    N.d. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/12976/Albigensian-Crusade .   Accessed 22 Aug 2014. Albigensian Crusade Albigensian Crusade ,   Crusade (1209–29) called by Pope Innocent III against the Cathari , a dualist religious movement in southern France that the Roman Catholic Church had branded heretical . The war pitted the nobility of staunchly Catholic northern France against that of the south, where the Cathari were tolerated and even enjoyed the support of the nobles. Although the Crusade did not eliminate Catharism, it eventually enabled the French king to establish his authority over the south. Historical background By the middle of the 12th century, control of Jerusalem and the Holy Land was no longer the only goal of the Crusades . Rather
Read more