27 February 1871 A.D. Lewis Sperry Chafer Born
27 February 1871 A.D. Lewis Sperry Chafer Born
February 27: Lewis Sperry Chafer [1871-1952]
Sparkman, Wayne. “February 27: Lewis Sperry Chafer [1871-1952].” This Day in Presbyterian History. 27 Feb
2015. http://www.thisday.pcahistory.org/2015/02/february-27-3/.
Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
February 27: Lewis Sperry Chafer [1871-1952]
Yep.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the founder of Dallas Theological Seminary, was a
Presbyterian. As was Chafer’s mentor, C. I. (Cyrus Ingerson) Scofield, and as
was Scofield’s mentor, James H. Brookes. Presbyterians all. Perhaps that helps
to explain how it was the dispensationalism made such inroads into Presbyterian
circles in the era from the 1880’s to the 1930’s. That, and the fact that
dispensationalists did a fair job of defending the Scriptures when few others.
apart from the Princeton conservatives, would or could.
Lewis
Sperry Chafer was born in Ashtabula county, Ohio, on February 27, 1871. His parents were the
Rev. Thomas Franklin Chafer, a Congregationalist pastor, and Lois Lomira Sperry
Chafer, the daughter of a Welsh Wesleyan lay preacher. When Lewis was just
eleven, his father died of tuberculosis. Lewis developed an interest in music while
attending the New Lyme Institute as he prepared for college. At Oberlin
College, he majored in music and met his future wife, Ella Loraine Case. After
their marriage in 1896, he began to serve as an evangelist.
An
invitation to teach at the Northfield Boys School in turn led to a close
friendship with C. I. Scofield, and as they say, the rest is history. Dallas
Theological Seminary, founded in 1924 as the Evangelical Theological College,
continues to this day. Its founder, Lewis Sperry Chafer, died on August 22,
1952.
In
a prior post we
talked about Milo Jamison’s role in the split that created the Bible
Presbyterian Church. Jamison was a dispensationalist, while the recently formed
denomination that was renamed the Orthodox Presbyterian Church was quickly
aligning itself against that system. In the last several decades,
dispensationalism as a system has been going through a number of changes, but
historically it has been anchored to three key tenets: (1) A “normal, literal”
interpretation of Scripture; (2) A strict distinction between Israel and the
Church; and (3) a scheme of dispensations or ages which divide up Biblical
history. The latter two points are particularly where we find ourselves in
disagreement with dispensationalism.
D. James
Kennedy, when examining men for ordination, would routinely ask for the
candidate’s views on dispensationalism, and whether the candidate approved or
disapproved of the 1944 Southern Presbyterian report
on dispensationalism. And Dr. Kennedy was right to use that Report
in that way. However, the untold story behind that PCUS report is that in all
likelihood, the Report was an attempt to split the conservatives in the
Southern Presbyterian denomination, many of whom at that time were
dispensationalists. As modernists were gaining power in the PCUS, the 1944
Report gave them an opportunity to set one camp of conservatives over against
another and so dampen opposition to their own agenda.
In Sum:
Few conservative Presbyterians today consider themselves dispensationalists. The old Reformation doctrine—really the old Biblical doctrine—of covenant theology is being taught once again, and taught well in our seminaries and in our churches. How it came to be virtually ignored in the 19th-century is something of a mystery, but the general lack of such teaching in that era does help to explain the rise of dispensationalism during the same time period. Nature abhors a vacuum.
Few conservative Presbyterians today consider themselves dispensationalists. The old Reformation doctrine—really the old Biblical doctrine—of covenant theology is being taught once again, and taught well in our seminaries and in our churches. How it came to be virtually ignored in the 19th-century is something of a mystery, but the general lack of such teaching in that era does help to explain the rise of dispensationalism during the same time period. Nature abhors a vacuum.
For Further
Study:
One of the better popular-level works on covenant theology is O. Palmer Robertson’s Christ of the Covenants. Ask your pastor about other helpful materials on this important subject.
One of the better popular-level works on covenant theology is O. Palmer Robertson’s Christ of the Covenants. Ask your pastor about other helpful materials on this important subject.
Image
source: From a photograph on file at the PCA Historical Center,
with the scan prepared by the staff of the Historical Center. The photograph
lacks any indication as to who the photographer might have been.
Comments
Post a Comment