4 October 2015 A.D. Jewel’s “Apology”—English Reformers slanders as “heretics,” “renegades, and “that we have torn Christ’s seat…” pp.88-89
4 October 2015
A.D. Jewel’s “Apology”—English Reformers slanders as
“heretics,” “renegades, and “that we have torn Christ’s seat…” tpp.88-89
Jewel, John. “The Apology of the Church of England.”
Project Gutenberg. 5 Aug 2006. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/17678/17678-h/17678-h.htm.
Accessed 1 Aug 2015.These things were believed of many, not because they
were true, indeed (for what could be more untrue?), but because they were like
to be true, and through a certain shadow of truth might the more easily deceive the simple. On this fashion likewise do
these men slander us as heretics, and say that we have left the Church and
fellowship of Christ: not because they think it is true—for they do not much
force of that, but because to ignorant folk it might, perhaps, some way appear
true. We have, indeed, put ourselves apart not as heretics are wont, from
the Church of Christ, but as all good men ought to do, from the infection of
naughty persons and hypocrites.
Nevertheless, in this point they triumph
marvellously—“that they be the Church, that their Church is Christ’s spouse,
the pillar of truth, the ark of Noah;” and that without it there is no hope of
salvation. Contrariwise they say, “that we be renegades; that we have
torn Christ’s seat;” that we are plucked quite off from the body of Christ, and
have forsaken the Catholic faith. And when they leave nothing unspoken
that may never so falsely and maliciously be said against us, yet this one
thing are they never able truly to say, that we have swerved either from the
Word of God, or from the Apostles of Christ, or from the primitive
Church. Surely we have ever judged the primitive Church of Christ’s time,
of the Apostles and of the holy fathers, to be the Catholic Church; neither
make we doubt to name it, “Noah’s ark, Christ’s spouse, the
pillar and upholder of all truth;” nor yet to fix therein the whole mean of our
salvation. It is doubtless an odious matter for one to leave the
fellowship whereunto he hath been accustomed, and specially of those men, who,
though they be not, yet at least seem and be called Christians. And, to
say truly, we do not despise the Church of these men (howsoever it be ordered
by them now-a-days), partly for the name’s sake itself, and partly for that the
Gospel of Jesus Christ hath once been therein truly and purely set forth.
Neither had we departed therefrom, but of very necessity, and much against our
wills. But I put case, an idol be set up in the Church of God, and the
same desolation, which Christ prophesied to come, stood openly in the holy
place. What if some thief or pirate invade and possess “Noah’s
ark?” These folks, as often as they tell us of the Church, mean thereby
themselves alone, and attribute all these titles to their own selves, boasting,
as they did in times past which cried, “The temple of the Lord, the temple of
the Lord;” or as the Pharisees and Scribes did, which craked they were
“Abraham’s children.”
Comments
Post a Comment